Make vs Cowork
并排对比，帮助您选择合适的工具。
85
Make 总体得分更高 (85/100)
但最佳选择取决于您的具体需求。请看下方对比。
| 功能 | Make | Cowork |
|---|---|---|
| 我们的评分 | 85 | 82 |
| 定价 | Free plan available. Paid plans scale by operations, credits, and advanced features. | 作为研究预览功能，与支持的 Claude 付费计划绑定，尤其是 Pro 和 Max 套餐。 |
| 免费版 | 是 | 否 |
| 最适合 | Ops teams building more complex visual automations, Users who want a more flexible builder than basic trigger-action tools, Companies mixing no-code workflows with light code steps | 希望 Claude 更自主工作的高级用户, 需要在手机和桌面工作流之间切换的用户, 愿意授权 Claude 访问更广泛本地上下文的用户 |
| 平台 | web, api | web, mac, windows, ios, android |
| API | 是 | 否 |
| 语言 | en | en |
| 优点 |
|
|
| 缺点 |
|
|
| 立即开始 | 访问网站 |
Make
85
- 定价
- Free plan available. Paid plans scale by operations, credits, and advanced features.
- 免费版
- 是
- 最适合
- Ops teams building more complex visual automations, Users who want a more flexible builder than basic trigger-action tools, Companies mixing no-code workflows with light code steps
- 平台
- web, api
- API
- 是
- 语言
- en
85选择 Make 如果:
- 您是Ops teams building more complex visual automations
- 您是Users who want a more flexible builder than basic trigger-action tools
- 您是Companies mixing no-code workflows with light code steps
- 您想免费开始
常见问题
- Make 和 Cowork 有什么区别?
- Make is make is a visual automation platform that gives users more control and transparency than many simple trigger-action tools. it is ideal for users who like seeing logic, branches, and data flow instead of hiding everything behind a wizard. Cowork is anthropic 面向任务的工作空间，让 claude 能够跨桌面环境、文件和已连接工具执行耗时较长的工作。
- Make 和 Cowork 哪个更便宜?
- Make: Free plan available. Paid plans scale by operations, credits, and advanced features.. Cowork: 作为研究预览功能，与支持的 Claude 付费计划绑定，尤其是 Pro 和 Max 套餐。. Make 提供免费版。
- Make 最适合谁?
- Make 最适合Ops teams building more complex visual automations, Users who want a more flexible builder than basic trigger-action tools, Companies mixing no-code workflows with light code steps。
- Cowork 最适合谁?
- Cowork 最适合希望 Claude 更自主工作的高级用户, 需要在手机和桌面工作流之间切换的用户, 愿意授权 Claude 访问更广泛本地上下文的用户。