Zapier vs Make

并排对比,帮助您选择合适的工具。

Zapier 总体得分更高 (86/100)

但最佳选择取决于您的具体需求。请看下方对比。

定价
Free plan available. Paid tiers scale by tasks, features, and pay-as-you-go options.
免费版
最适合
Business teams automating work across many SaaS tools, Operators who want a huge app catalog, Non-technical users creating practical automation fast
平台
web, api
API
语言
en
定价
Free plan available. Paid plans scale by operations, credits, and advanced features.
免费版
最适合
Ops teams building more complex visual automations, Users who want a more flexible builder than basic trigger-action tools, Companies mixing no-code workflows with light code steps
平台
web, api
API
语言
en

选择 Zapier 如果:

  • 您是Business teams automating work across many SaaS tools
  • 您是Operators who want a huge app catalog
  • 您是Non-technical users creating practical automation fast
  • 您想免费开始
阅读 Zapier 评测 →

选择 Make 如果:

  • 您是Ops teams building more complex visual automations
  • 您是Users who want a more flexible builder than basic trigger-action tools
  • 您是Companies mixing no-code workflows with light code steps
  • 您想免费开始
阅读 Make 评测 →

常见问题

Zapier 和 Make 有什么区别?
Zapier is zapier is the default automation platform for connecting apps, workflows, and now ai agents across a huge app ecosystem. it is best when breadth of integrations matters more than visual elegance or self-hosting. Make is make is a visual automation platform that gives users more control and transparency than many simple trigger-action tools. it is ideal for users who like seeing logic, branches, and data flow instead of hiding everything behind a wizard.
Zapier 和 Make 哪个更便宜?
Zapier: Free plan available. Paid tiers scale by tasks, features, and pay-as-you-go options.. Make: Free plan available. Paid plans scale by operations, credits, and advanced features.. Zapier 提供免费版。 Make 提供免费版。
Zapier 最适合谁?
Zapier 最适合Business teams automating work across many SaaS tools, Operators who want a huge app catalog, Non-technical users creating practical automation fast。
Make 最适合谁?
Make 最适合Ops teams building more complex visual automations, Users who want a more flexible builder than basic trigger-action tools, Companies mixing no-code workflows with light code steps。