Apify vs Consensus
A side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool.
78
Apify scores higher overall (78/100)
But the best choice depends on your specific needs. Compare below.
| Feature | Apify | Consensus |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 78 | 76 |
| Pricing | Free tier with $5/month platform credits. Starter at $49/month. Scale at $499/month. Enterprise custom pricing. | Free plan with limited AI summaries. Premium plan at $8.99/month with unlimited AI features and enhanced results. |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | teams that need pre-built scrapers from the Actor marketplace, non-developers who prefer a visual workflow builder over code, enterprises running large-scale scraping with proxy management, data teams collecting structured datasets from well-known sites, agencies managing multiple scraping projects for clients | researchers looking for evidence-based answers from published literature, students writing papers who need quick access to relevant studies, health professionals seeking clinical evidence summaries, science communicators fact-checking claims against published research |
| Platforms | web, api | web |
| API | Yes | No |
| Languages | en | en |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Visit site | Visit site |
Apify
78
- Pricing
- Free tier with $5/month platform credits. Starter at $49/month. Scale at $499/month. Enterprise custom pricing.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- teams that need pre-built scrapers from the Actor marketplace, non-developers who prefer a visual workflow builder over code, enterprises running large-scale scraping with proxy management, data teams collecting structured datasets from well-known sites, agencies managing multiple scraping projects for clients
- Platforms
- web, api
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
- Pricing
- Free plan with limited AI summaries. Premium plan at $8.99/month with unlimited AI features and enhanced results.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- researchers looking for evidence-based answers from published literature, students writing papers who need quick access to relevant studies, health professionals seeking clinical evidence summaries, science communicators fact-checking claims against published research
- Platforms
- web
- API
- No
- Languages
- en
78Choose Apify if:
- You are teams that need pre-built scrapers from the Actor marketplace
- You are non-developers who prefer a visual workflow builder over code
- You are enterprises running large-scale scraping with proxy management
- You want to start free
76Choose Consensus if:
- You are researchers looking for evidence-based answers from published literature
- You are students writing papers who need quick access to relevant studies
- You are health professionals seeking clinical evidence summaries
- You want to start free
FAQ
- What is the difference between Apify and Consensus?
- Apify is a full-featured web scraping and automation platform with a visual builder, a marketplace of pre-built scrapers (actors), and managed proxy infrastructure. covers a wide range of use cases from simple page scraping to complex browser automation workflows. Consensus is ai-powered academic search engine that finds and summarizes answers from peer-reviewed scientific papers, helping users get evidence-based responses to research questions.
- Which is cheaper, Apify or Consensus?
- Apify: Free tier with $5/month platform credits. Starter at $49/month. Scale at $499/month. Enterprise custom pricing.. Consensus: Free plan with limited AI summaries. Premium plan at $8.99/month with unlimited AI features and enhanced results.. Apify has a free plan. Consensus has a free plan.
- Who is Apify best for?
- Apify is best for teams that need pre-built scrapers from the Actor marketplace, non-developers who prefer a visual workflow builder over code, enterprises running large-scale scraping with proxy management, data teams collecting structured datasets from well-known sites, agencies managing multiple scraping projects for clients.
- Who is Consensus best for?
- Consensus is best for researchers looking for evidence-based answers from published literature, students writing papers who need quick access to relevant studies, health professionals seeking clinical evidence summaries, science communicators fact-checking claims against published research.