Cursor vs Mastra
A side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool.
91
Cursor scores higher overall (91/100)
But the best choice depends on your specific needs. Compare below.
| Feature | Cursor | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 91 | 80 |
| Pricing | Hobby is free. Pro starts at $20/month, Pro+ at $60/month, and Ultra at $200/month. | Fully open source under MIT license. No cloud fees. Self-hosted on your own infrastructure. |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Developers who want an AI-native coding workflow, Small teams moving quickly on product code, Engineers doing larger refactors across many files | TypeScript and Node.js developers who want a structured, production-ready agent framework, Teams building internal AI copilots or customer-facing assistants with full code control, Startups embedding AI capabilities into products that need evals and tracing from day one |
| Platforms | mac, windows, linux | api, web |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | en | en |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Visit site | Visit site |
Cursor
91
- Pricing
- Hobby is free. Pro starts at $20/month, Pro+ at $60/month, and Ultra at $200/month.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- Developers who want an AI-native coding workflow, Small teams moving quickly on product code, Engineers doing larger refactors across many files
- Platforms
- mac, windows, linux
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
Mastra
80
- Pricing
- Fully open source under MIT license. No cloud fees. Self-hosted on your own infrastructure.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- TypeScript and Node.js developers who want a structured, production-ready agent framework, Teams building internal AI copilots or customer-facing assistants with full code control, Startups embedding AI capabilities into products that need evals and tracing from day one
- Platforms
- api, web
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
91Choose Cursor if:
- You are Developers who want an AI-native coding workflow
- You are Small teams moving quickly on product code
- You are Engineers doing larger refactors across many files
- You want to start free
80Choose Mastra if:
- You are TypeScript and Node.js developers who want a structured, production-ready agent framework
- You are Teams building internal AI copilots or customer-facing assistants with full code control
- You are Startups embedding AI capabilities into products that need evals and tracing from day one
- You want to start free
FAQ
- What is the difference between Cursor and Mastra?
- Cursor is cursor is an ai-native coding environment built for agentic development, codebase chat, and faster multi-file changes. it is a strong choice for developers who want ai at the center of the editor, not bolted on the side. Mastra is open-source typescript framework for building production-ready ai agents and multi-step workflows, with a local studio ui, typed zod schemas, built-in evals, and support for suspend/resume human-in-the-loop flows.
- Which is cheaper, Cursor or Mastra?
- Cursor: Hobby is free. Pro starts at $20/month, Pro+ at $60/month, and Ultra at $200/month.. Mastra: Fully open source under MIT license. No cloud fees. Self-hosted on your own infrastructure.. Cursor has a free plan. Mastra has a free plan.
- Who is Cursor best for?
- Cursor is best for Developers who want an AI-native coding workflow, Small teams moving quickly on product code, Engineers doing larger refactors across many files.
- Who is Mastra best for?
- Mastra is best for TypeScript and Node.js developers who want a structured, production-ready agent framework, Teams building internal AI copilots or customer-facing assistants with full code control, Startups embedding AI capabilities into products that need evals and tracing from day one.