LangChain vs Mastra
A side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool.
84
LangChain scores higher overall (84/100)
But the best choice depends on your specific needs. Compare below.
| Feature | LangChain | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 84 | 80 |
| Pricing | Open-source framework; no license fee for the core project. | Fully open source under MIT license. No cloud fees. Self-hosted on your own infrastructure. |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Developers prototyping or shipping LLM apps quickly, Teams that want a big ecosystem of examples and integrations, Builders creating RAG or tool-using workflows | TypeScript and Node.js developers who want a structured, production-ready agent framework, Teams building internal AI copilots or customer-facing assistants with full code control, Startups embedding AI capabilities into products that need evals and tracing from day one |
| Platforms | mac, windows, linux, api | api, web |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | en | en |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Visit site | Visit site |
- Pricing
- Open-source framework; no license fee for the core project.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- Developers prototyping or shipping LLM apps quickly, Teams that want a big ecosystem of examples and integrations, Builders creating RAG or tool-using workflows
- Platforms
- mac, windows, linux, api
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
Mastra
80
- Pricing
- Fully open source under MIT license. No cloud fees. Self-hosted on your own infrastructure.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- TypeScript and Node.js developers who want a structured, production-ready agent framework, Teams building internal AI copilots or customer-facing assistants with full code control, Startups embedding AI capabilities into products that need evals and tracing from day one
- Platforms
- api, web
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
84Choose LangChain if:
- You are Developers prototyping or shipping LLM apps quickly
- You are Teams that want a big ecosystem of examples and integrations
- You are Builders creating RAG or tool-using workflows
- You want to start free
80Choose Mastra if:
- You are TypeScript and Node.js developers who want a structured, production-ready agent framework
- You are Teams building internal AI copilots or customer-facing assistants with full code control
- You are Startups embedding AI capabilities into products that need evals and tracing from day one
- You want to start free
FAQ
- What is the difference between LangChain and Mastra?
- LangChain is a widely used open-source framework for building llm apps with tools, chains, retrieval, and agent workflows. Mastra is open-source typescript framework for building production-ready ai agents and multi-step workflows, with a local studio ui, typed zod schemas, built-in evals, and support for suspend/resume human-in-the-loop flows.
- Which is cheaper, LangChain or Mastra?
- LangChain: Open-source framework; no license fee for the core project.. Mastra: Fully open source under MIT license. No cloud fees. Self-hosted on your own infrastructure.. LangChain has a free plan. Mastra has a free plan.
- Who is LangChain best for?
- LangChain is best for Developers prototyping or shipping LLM apps quickly, Teams that want a big ecosystem of examples and integrations, Builders creating RAG or tool-using workflows.
- Who is Mastra best for?
- Mastra is best for TypeScript and Node.js developers who want a structured, production-ready agent framework, Teams building internal AI copilots or customer-facing assistants with full code control, Startups embedding AI capabilities into products that need evals and tracing from day one.