llama.cpp vs Windsurf
A side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool.
90
llama.cpp scores higher overall (90/100)
But the best choice depends on your specific needs. Compare below.
| Feature | llama.cpp | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 90 | 88 |
| Pricing | Open-source project; no license fee for the runtime itself. | Free tier with 25 credits/month. Pro at $15/month with 500 credits. Teams at $30/user/month. Enterprise pricing is custom. |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Developers and hobbyists running models locally, Privacy-conscious users who want offline inference, Teams prototyping on laptops or edge devices | Developers who want AI-powered coding across multiple IDEs, not just one editor, Teams working on complex multi-file refactoring and large codebases, Enterprise teams needing FedRAMP, HIPAA, or ITAR compliance, Cost-conscious developers who want Cursor-level features at a lower price |
| Platforms | mac, windows, linux, api | mac, windows, linux |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | en | en |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Visit site | Visit site |
- Pricing
- Open-source project; no license fee for the runtime itself.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- Developers and hobbyists running models locally, Privacy-conscious users who want offline inference, Teams prototyping on laptops or edge devices
- Platforms
- mac, windows, linux, api
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
Windsurf
88
- Pricing
- Free tier with 25 credits/month. Pro at $15/month with 500 credits. Teams at $30/user/month. Enterprise pricing is custom.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- Developers who want AI-powered coding across multiple IDEs, not just one editor, Teams working on complex multi-file refactoring and large codebases, Enterprise teams needing FedRAMP, HIPAA, or ITAR compliance, Cost-conscious developers who want Cursor-level features at a lower price
- Platforms
- mac, windows, linux
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
90Choose llama.cpp if:
- You are Developers and hobbyists running models locally
- You are Privacy-conscious users who want offline inference
- You are Teams prototyping on laptops or edge devices
- You want to start free
88Choose Windsurf if:
- You are Developers who want AI-powered coding across multiple IDEs, not just one editor
- You are Teams working on complex multi-file refactoring and large codebases
- You are Enterprise teams needing FedRAMP, HIPAA, or ITAR compliance
- You want to start free
FAQ
- What is the difference between llama.cpp and Windsurf?
- llama.cpp is the go-to open-source runtime for running many local llms on consumer hardware, especially via gguf models. Windsurf is windsurf is an ai-native code editor with agentic capabilities that understands your entire codebase and applies multi-file changes autonomously. ranked #1 in ai dev tool power rankings, it offers broader ide compatibility than cursor at a lower price point.
- Which is cheaper, llama.cpp or Windsurf?
- llama.cpp: Open-source project; no license fee for the runtime itself.. Windsurf: Free tier with 25 credits/month. Pro at $15/month with 500 credits. Teams at $30/user/month. Enterprise pricing is custom.. llama.cpp has a free plan. Windsurf has a free plan.
- Who is llama.cpp best for?
- llama.cpp is best for Developers and hobbyists running models locally, Privacy-conscious users who want offline inference, Teams prototyping on laptops or edge devices.
- Who is Windsurf best for?
- Windsurf is best for Developers who want AI-powered coding across multiple IDEs, not just one editor, Teams working on complex multi-file refactoring and large codebases, Enterprise teams needing FedRAMP, HIPAA, or ITAR compliance, Cost-conscious developers who want Cursor-level features at a lower price.