Manus vs Google Opal
A side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool.
82
Manus scores higher overall (82/100)
But the best choice depends on your specific needs. Compare below.
| Feature | Manus | Google Opal |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 82 | 78 |
| Pricing | Free tier with limited task credits. Starter plan around $39/month for higher concurrency and usage limits. Professional plan around $199/month with team collaboration and priority execution. Enterprise pricing available on request. | Public/preview positioning with pricing not clearly separated as a standalone commercial plan. |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Knowledge workers who need a reliable autonomous agent for research and data gathering, Founders and solo operators automating repetitive multi-step workflows, Analysts who need an agent to pull data, process it, and produce reports, Developers building on top of an existing production-grade agentic framework, Teams evaluating autonomous AI agents for enterprise deployment | Ops and business teams prototyping AI workflows quickly, Builders who want something lighter than full code, Teams exploring shareable AI task flows |
| Platforms | web, desktop | web |
| API | No | Yes |
| Languages | en, zh | en |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Visit site | Visit site |
Manus
82
- Pricing
- Free tier with limited task credits. Starter plan around $39/month for higher concurrency and usage limits. Professional plan around $199/month with team collaboration and priority execution. Enterprise pricing available on request.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- Knowledge workers who need a reliable autonomous agent for research and data gathering, Founders and solo operators automating repetitive multi-step workflows, Analysts who need an agent to pull data, process it, and produce reports, Developers building on top of an existing production-grade agentic framework, Teams evaluating autonomous AI agents for enterprise deployment
- Platforms
- web, desktop
- API
- No
- Languages
- en, zh
- Pricing
- Public/preview positioning with pricing not clearly separated as a standalone commercial plan.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- Ops and business teams prototyping AI workflows quickly, Builders who want something lighter than full code, Teams exploring shareable AI task flows
- Platforms
- web
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
82Choose Manus if:
- You are Knowledge workers who need a reliable autonomous agent for research and data gathering
- You are Founders and solo operators automating repetitive multi-step workflows
- You are Analysts who need an agent to pull data, process it, and produce reports
- You want to start free
78Choose Google Opal if:
- You are Ops and business teams prototyping AI workflows quickly
- You are Builders who want something lighter than full code
- You are Teams exploring shareable AI task flows
- You want to start free
FAQ
- What is the difference between Manus and Google Opal?
- Manus is manus is a fully autonomous ai agent that plans and executes multi-step tasks end-to-end: browsing the web, writing and running code, analyzing data, managing files, and completing complex workflows without continuous human input. Google Opal is google's no-code or low-code ai workflow builder for chaining prompts, models, and tools into shareable mini-app style flows.
- Which is cheaper, Manus or Google Opal?
- Manus: Free tier with limited task credits. Starter plan around $39/month for higher concurrency and usage limits. Professional plan around $199/month with team collaboration and priority execution. Enterprise pricing available on request.. Google Opal: Public/preview positioning with pricing not clearly separated as a standalone commercial plan.. Manus has a free plan. Google Opal has a free plan.
- Who is Manus best for?
- Manus is best for Knowledge workers who need a reliable autonomous agent for research and data gathering, Founders and solo operators automating repetitive multi-step workflows, Analysts who need an agent to pull data, process it, and produce reports, Developers building on top of an existing production-grade agentic framework, Teams evaluating autonomous AI agents for enterprise deployment.
- Who is Google Opal best for?
- Google Opal is best for Ops and business teams prototyping AI workflows quickly, Builders who want something lighter than full code, Teams exploring shareable AI task flows.