Claude Code vs Devin
A side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool.
87
Claude Code scores higher overall (87/100)
But the best choice depends on your specific needs. Compare below.
| Feature | Claude Code | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 87 | 77 |
| Pricing | Access is included in some Claude paid plans and can also involve separate Anthropic API or console usage depending on workflow. | Free Devin Review for any GitHub PR. Flexible pay-as-you-go plan at $20/month plus compute usage. Team and Enterprise plans available with custom pricing. |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Best for | Developers who want AI to operate more actively on code, Teams already using Claude and Anthropic models, Engineers who prefer terminal-based workflows | Engineering teams that want to delegate well-scoped coding tasks to an autonomous agent, Developers who need a second pair of eyes on PRs via the free Devin Review feature, Startups moving fast who need an AI that can take a ticket end-to-end without supervision, Teams evaluating autonomous AI engineers alongside Copilot and Cursor |
| Platforms | mac, windows, linux, api | web |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | en | en |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Visit site | Visit site |
- Pricing
- Access is included in some Claude paid plans and can also involve separate Anthropic API or console usage depending on workflow.
- Free plan
- No
- Best for
- Developers who want AI to operate more actively on code, Teams already using Claude and Anthropic models, Engineers who prefer terminal-based workflows
- Platforms
- mac, windows, linux, api
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
Devin
77
- Pricing
- Free Devin Review for any GitHub PR. Flexible pay-as-you-go plan at $20/month plus compute usage. Team and Enterprise plans available with custom pricing.
- Free plan
- Yes
- Best for
- Engineering teams that want to delegate well-scoped coding tasks to an autonomous agent, Developers who need a second pair of eyes on PRs via the free Devin Review feature, Startups moving fast who need an AI that can take a ticket end-to-end without supervision, Teams evaluating autonomous AI engineers alongside Copilot and Cursor
- Platforms
- web
- API
- Yes
- Languages
- en
87Choose Claude Code if:
- You are Developers who want AI to operate more actively on code
- You are Teams already using Claude and Anthropic models
- You are Engineers who prefer terminal-based workflows
77Choose Devin if:
- You are Engineering teams that want to delegate well-scoped coding tasks to an autonomous agent
- You are Developers who need a second pair of eyes on PRs via the free Devin Review feature
- You are Startups moving fast who need an AI that can take a ticket end-to-end without supervision
- You want to start free
FAQ
- What is the difference between Claude Code and Devin?
- Claude Code is anthropic's coding agent experience for repo-aware development tasks, available directly in terminal-centric workflows. Devin is devin is an autonomous ai software engineer by cognition ai that plans, codes, debugs, and deploys across full codebases in a cloud-based ide. devin 2.0 introduced parallel agents, a $20/month plan, and a free code review tool for any github pr.
- Which is cheaper, Claude Code or Devin?
- Claude Code: Access is included in some Claude paid plans and can also involve separate Anthropic API or console usage depending on workflow.. Devin: Free Devin Review for any GitHub PR. Flexible pay-as-you-go plan at $20/month plus compute usage. Team and Enterprise plans available with custom pricing.. Devin has a free plan.
- Who is Claude Code best for?
- Claude Code is best for Developers who want AI to operate more actively on code, Teams already using Claude and Anthropic models, Engineers who prefer terminal-based workflows.
- Who is Devin best for?
- Devin is best for Engineering teams that want to delegate well-scoped coding tasks to an autonomous agent, Developers who need a second pair of eyes on PRs via the free Devin Review feature, Startups moving fast who need an AI that can take a ticket end-to-end without supervision, Teams evaluating autonomous AI engineers alongside Copilot and Cursor.